Card game dammit rules
On appeal, the Federal Circuit has affirmed – agreeing that the method of playing cards is an unpatentable abstract idea.
constitutes a patent-ineligible abstract idea.” The particular physical steps such as shuffling and dealing are conventional elements of card-gambling and therefore (according to the Board) insufficient to transform the claimed abstract idea into a patent eligible invention.
#Card game dammit rules trial#
In reviewing the application, the Examiner Layno (Games art unit 3711) rejected these card games patents as ineligible under Section 101 – noting that the claim is “an attempt to claim a new set of rules for playing a card game qualifies as an abstract idea.” The Patent Trial & Appeal Board affirmed that ruling – holding that “independent claim 1 is directed to a set of rules for conducting a wagering game which. Bets are then taken with the potential of more dealing and eventually all wagers are resolved. Claim 1 in particular requires a deck of ‘physical playing cards” that are shuffled and then dealt according to a defined pattern. The new approach offers ability to bet on the occurrence of “natural 0” hands as well as other potential side bets. Ray and Amanda Smith’s patent applications claims a new method of playing Blackjack.